Third World Liberation Front Strike (SF State, 1968)
The Third World Liberation Front (TWLF) Strike at San Francisco State University in 1968 was a pivotal moment in the history of higher education, marking the first and longest student strike focused on ethnic studies. Beginning in November 1968, the strike, led by students of color, demanded the creation of a Department of Ethnic Studies, challenging the predominantly Eurocentric curriculum and systemic inequalities within the university. The events at SF State reverberated across the nation, inspiring similar movements and ultimately contributing to the establishment of ethnic studies programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
History
The roots of the TWLF strike lay in the growing Civil Rights Movement and the increasing awareness of racial injustice in the United States. Students of color at San Francisco State University felt marginalized and excluded by a curriculum that largely ignored their histories, cultures, and experiences. Existing attempts to address these concerns through traditional channels proved insufficient, leading students to organize and demand more substantial change. The TWLF was formed as a coalition of various student groups, including Black Student Union, Latin American Student Organization, Asian American Political Alliance, and El Centro Filipino, uniting under the common goal of self-determination and educational equity. [1]
The strike officially began on November 6, 1968, with a campus-wide walkout organized by the TWLF. Thousands of students participated, effectively halting classes and disrupting normal university operations. The TWLF presented a list of non-negotiable demands, chief among them the establishment of a Department of Ethnic Studies with full degree-granting authority. They also sought the hiring of more faculty of color, increased financial aid for minority students, and a more inclusive curriculum that reflected the diversity of the student body. Negotiations between the TWLF and the university administration proved difficult and protracted, marked by periods of intense conflict and stalemate. The administration initially resisted the demands, citing concerns about academic standards and the potential for reverse discrimination.
Culture
The cultural context of 1968 San Francisco played a significant role in shaping the TWLF strike. The city was a hub of social and political activism, experiencing the height of the counterculture movement and anti-war protests. This atmosphere of dissent and challenge to established norms provided fertile ground for the TWLF’s demands. The burgeoning Black Power movement, the Chicano Movement, and the Asian American Movement all contributed to the intellectual and political framework that informed the strike. Students drew inspiration from these movements, adopting their strategies of direct action and community organizing. [2]
The strike itself became a cultural event, fostering a sense of community and solidarity among students of color. The campus was transformed into a space for political education, with teach-ins, rallies, and cultural performances. Students shared their personal stories and experiences of discrimination, raising awareness among the broader campus community. The TWLF also sought to connect with and mobilize support from local communities of color in San Francisco, building alliances with organizations working on issues of social justice and economic equality. The strike’s cultural impact extended beyond the university, inspiring similar movements at other institutions and contributing to a broader national conversation about race, education, and power.
Neighborhoods
While the strike was centered at San Francisco State University, its impact extended into surrounding neighborhoods, particularly those with significant populations of color. The Mission District, with its large Latino community, became a key base of support for the TWLF. Students and activists organized rallies and demonstrations in the Mission, seeking to raise awareness and garner support for their cause. The Fillmore District, historically a center of African American culture and community, also played a role in the strike, with residents providing financial and logistical support to the students. [3]
The connections between the university and these neighborhoods highlighted the broader social and political context of the strike. Students argued that the university had a responsibility to serve the needs of the surrounding communities, and that its curriculum should reflect the realities of urban life. The strike also raised questions about the role of universities in perpetuating systemic inequalities and the need for institutions of higher education to be more responsive to the demands of marginalized communities. The involvement of neighborhood residents demonstrated the interconnectedness of the struggle for educational equity and the broader fight for social justice.
Notable Residents
Although the strike was driven by students, several faculty members at San Francisco State University played important roles in supporting the TWLF’s demands. While not always publicly aligned with the strike, some professors provided guidance, resources, and advocacy for the students. These faculty members often faced pressure from the university administration and colleagues for their support, demonstrating the risks involved in challenging the status quo. Identifying specific faculty members who were central to the movement requires further research beyond the provided sources. [4]
Beyond the university, community leaders and activists in neighborhoods like the Mission District and the Fillmore District provided crucial support to the striking students. These individuals helped to organize rallies, raise funds, and provide safe havens for students facing arrest or harassment. Their contributions underscored the importance of community involvement in the success of the strike. The strike also attracted the attention of national figures in the Civil Rights and anti-war movements, some of whom visited the campus to show their solidarity with the students.
Getting There
Access to San Francisco State University during the 1968 strike was significantly impacted by the protests and demonstrations. Public transportation, including buses and streetcars, continued to operate, but routes were sometimes disrupted by pickets and rallies. The campus itself was often blocked by student protesters, making it difficult for those not involved in the strike to access buildings and classrooms. [5]
The strike also led to increased police presence on and around campus, further complicating access. Law enforcement officers were deployed to maintain order and prevent violence, but their presence often escalated tensions. Students and supporters organized carpools and alternative transportation methods to circumvent the disruptions and ensure that people could participate in the strike. The challenges of getting to and from campus underscored the determination of the students to continue their protest despite the obstacles.